A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH PHRASAL VERBS AND THEIR UZBEK LEXICAL EQUIVALENTS

Article Metrics
Abstract Views 6
PDF Downloads 11
Authors
  • Gulbahor Husanovna Turgunboeva UZ

    Umbrella Learning Center, Uzbekistan
Keywords:
Contrastive Linguistics English Uzbek Phrasal Verbs Lexical Equivalence Polysemy Phraseology Multiword Verbs EFL
Abstract

This article examines how selected English phrasal verbs correspond to Uzbek lexical and phraseological expressions. Its objective is to describe semantic correspondence, contextual variation, and structural differences between the two languages. The study uses a qualitative descriptive and contrastive approach with a reported analytical sample of 30 English multiword verbs. Contextual examples are compared in terms of meaning, grammatical structure, collocation, and functional use. Four overlapping analytical dimensions are distinguished: direct lexical correspondence, one-to-many correspondence, context-dependent correspondence, and multiword or phraseological rendering. The illustrative comparisons show that the same English form can require different Uzbek equivalents across senses. For example, take off refers to removing clothing or an aircraft leaving the ground, whereas break down expresses mechanical failure or analytical division. English particle placement also differs from the Uzbek constructions used to express comparable meanings. These observations suggest that lexical equivalence should be established at the level of a contextualized sense rather than through a single translation assigned to an entire English form. The contribution is a descriptive framework for organizing English–Uzbek correspondences; the categories are not treated as mutually exclusive frequency classes. Practical implications include teaching meanings with contextual examples and presenting grammatical behaviour alongside translation. The analysis does not establish the prevalence of individual correspondence patterns or demonstrate learning gains. Its limitations include a small qualitative sample, incomplete documentation of item selection, and the absence of independent validation of Uzbek equivalents. Future research should provide a complete item inventory and use bilingual corpus evidence and learner data to test the proposed descriptions.

References

[1] R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, U.K.: Longman, 1985.

[2] D. Bolinger, The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

[3] D. Gardner and M. Davies, “Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 339–359, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.x. Wiley Online Library

[4] R. Lado, Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press, 1957.

[5] M. Baker, In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2018.

[6] M. McCarthy and F. O’Dell, English Phrasal Verbs in Use: Intermediate. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

[7] S. Thornbury, How to Teach Vocabulary. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson Education, 2002. pearson.com

[8] G. Yule, The Study of Language, 7th ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

[9] M. Garnier and N. Schmitt, “The PHaVE List: A pedagogical list of phrasal verbs and their most frequent meaning senses,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 645–666, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1362168814559798. Mélodie Garnier, Norbert Schmitt, 2015

[10] D. Liu, “The most frequently used English phrasal verbs in American and British English: A multicorpus examination,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 661–688, 2011, doi: 10.5054/tq.2011.247707. Wiley Online Library

[11] M. Dagut and B. Laufer, “Avoidance of phrasal verbs—A case for contrastive analysis,” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 1985, doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005167. cris.haifa.ac.il

[12] Y. Liao and Y. J. Fukuya, “Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English,” Language Learning, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 193–226, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00254.x. Wiley Online Library

[13] C. M. Darwin and L. S. Gray, “Going after the phrasal verb: An alternative approach to classification,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 65–83, 1999, doi: 10.2307/3588191. digitalcommons.cwu.edu

[14] R. Side, “Phrasal verbs: Sorting them out,” ELT Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 144–152, 1990, doi: 10.1093/elt/44.2.144. Oxford Academic

[15] A. Cornell, “Realistic goals in teaching and learning phrasal verbs,” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, vol. 23, nos. 1–4, pp. 269–280, 1985, doi: 10.1515/iral.1985.23.1-4.269.

How to Cite

Turgunboeva, G. H. (2026). A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH PHRASAL VERBS AND THEIR UZBEK LEXICAL EQUIVALENTS. Innovative: International Multidisciplinary Journal of Applied Technology (2995-486X), 4(10), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.51699/8wkprw51