Essentializing Basic Education: Focusing Core Teaching Motivation and Performance for Desired Results

Main Article Content

Jonathan M. Guizona

Abstract

This study examined the key outcome areas in the efficient provision of basic education services and work task motivation among teachers in Tudela District, Cebu Province, during the 2024–2025 school year. The findings provide a basis for developing an instructional engagement plan. Demographic data revealed that school heads were generally older than teachers. The profession remained female-dominated (66.43%), emphasizing the need for gender inclusivity in leadership roles. Most teachers pursued higher education, with 60.14% having master’s degree units and 26.57% holding a completed master’s degree, yet only 4.90% had doctoral-level studies. The study assessed instructional effectiveness across various domains, including class preparation, curriculum planning, and professional engagement. Teachers demonstrated efficient performance in content knowledge, pedagogy, and instructional delivery, effectively adapting strategies to diverse learners. A moderate positive correlation between teacher motivation and performance highlighted the importance of continuous support and professional development. Despite these strengths, challenges such as misalignment with educational standards, outdated supervisory models, and inadequate technological integration were identified, indicating the need for curriculum updates and training programs. The findings concluded that teachers’ instructional motivation corresponded moderately to their performance, which was rated as very efficient. Addressing identified concerns through policy reforms, professional development initiatives, and enhanced instructional strategies can improve teaching effectiveness and learning outcomes. Proposed measures are envisioned for its enhancement.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Guizona, J. M. . (2026). Essentializing Basic Education: Focusing Core Teaching Motivation and Performance for Desired Results. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 4(1), 36-81. https://www.multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/view/3735

References

1. Allais, S. (2017) Education service delivery: The disastrous case of outcomes-

based qualifications frameworks, Volume: 7 issue: 1, page(s): 65-78,

https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340600700106

2. Burke, R. J., & Major, D. A. (2021). Gender in Organizations: Are Men Allies or Adversaries to Women’s Career Advancement? Edward Elgar Publishing.

3. Bush, T. (2021). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

4. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2020). Resilient Teachers, Resilient Schools: Building and Sustaining Quality in Testing Times. Routledge.

5. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2022). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. Jossey-Bass.

6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered Educators: How High-Performing Systems Shape Teaching Quality Around the World. Jossey-Bass.

7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(3), 141-153

8. Fullan, M. (2018). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. Jossey-Bass.

9. Gonong, G. O. (2019) Addressing Teacher Professional Development Issues: Supporting Teacher Quality, 3-14, https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp- content/uploads/2018/07/EducSummitAddressingTeacherProfessionalDevelopmentIssues.Nov2_.pdf

10. Guskey, T. R. (2020). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin Press.

11. Hattie, J. (2022). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.

12. Marzano, R. J. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

13. Eagly, A. H., & Heilman, M. E. (2020). "Gender and leadership: Introduction to the special issue." The Leadership Quarterly, 31(6), 101327.

14. Fernet, Claude & Senécal, Caroline & Guay, Frederic & Marsh, Herb & Dowson,

Martin. (2018). The work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST). Journal of Career Assessment. 16. 256-279.10.1177/1069072707305764.

15. Fuller, K., Stevenson, H., & Travers, M. C. (2022). "Gender and educational leadership: The experience of women leaders worldwide." Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 7-23.

16. García, E., & Weiss, E. (2020). "The importance of early-career support for teachers." Economic Policy Institute Report, 12(3), 1-12.

17. Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2022). "Sustaining leadership capacity in schools: A systematic review." Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 341–364.

18. Kidjie Ian Saguin (2019) Designing effective governance of education, Policy Design and Practice, 2:2, 182-197, DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2019.1621034

19. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2021). "The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework for teachers and teacher educators." Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 1-23.

20. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2021). "Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited." School Leadership & Management, 41(1-2), 5-22.

21. Llego, M. A. (2022, August 30). How to Develop Effective Study Habits: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. TeacherPH. Retrieved August 30, 2022 from, https://www.teacherph.com/effective-study-habits/

22. Llego, M. (2017) Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST), https://www.teacherph.com/philippine-professional-standards-for-teachers/?fbclid=IwAR3w_FNDR-8f9pRPLJz-

BfODckkgzz9XgDp0tAVw8vsbgu0Uts2oYrWmzyc

23. McKinsey & Company. (2021). "Women in the Workplace 2021: Closing the Gender Leadership Gap." McKinsey & Company Research Report.

24. Mills, M., Martino, W., & Lingard, B. (2021). Male Teachers and the Feminized Teaching Profession: Addressing the Issues of Gender Equity and Retention. Palgrave Macmillan.

25. OECD. (2022). Education at a Glance 2022: Gender and Education Trends. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

26. Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). "Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of trends, frameworks, and models." Computers & Education, 180, 104449.

27. Saud Al-Dulaimi, Zaid. (2019). Education, Educational Services and their Quality.

Journal of Marketing Management. 4. 2333-6099. 10.15640/jmm.v4n1a6.

28. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher burnout: Relations between dimensions of burnout, perceived school context, and motivation for teaching. Social Psychology of Education, 24(1), 1-20.

29. Taris, T. W., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Are there causal relationships between the dimensions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory? A review and two longitudinal tests. Work & Stress, 35(1), 1-30.

30. UNESCO. (2015). Education for All 2000-2015: Achievements and Challenges. UNESCO Publishing.

31. UNESCO. (2021). Global Education Monitoring Report 2021: Gender and Education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

32. Williams, J., Martin, B., & Kruger, T. (2021). "Career trajectories of educators: Balancing professional growth and personal commitments." Journal of Educational Leadership & Policy Studies, 8(2), 67-89.